The US Census Bureau is reporting which cities now sit at the top of the population list and which ones are out-pacing the rest of us in growth. Out of the top 25 fastest growing population centers, 4 of them are in my state of Florida, though only two are in a major city, those being Orlando and Miami, predictably. The two fastest growing cities are not usually considered to be major players in the state, Port St. Lucie and Cape Coral.
As always population growth is a two-edged sword. For real estate agents we love having more people come to our areas since they will need a place to call home. That normally means more sales for us. On the other hand, in some states and areas (like Florida) our officials are always a step behind when it comes to getting infrastructure ready to handle the increased number of residents. Roads, schools, parks, jails, libraries, etc always seem to be in short supply. I used to be a teacher and it was a yearly sight that when a new school opened there would be a field full of portable classrooms out back since between the planning stage and the opening day, the school had become too small for the influx of new residents.
Oh well, that is just the way it is I guess. Hope you find the information concerning your own little piece of this big country interesting and informative.
Census Bureau Announces Most Populous Cities
Phoenix has become the nation’s fifth most populous city, according to U.S. Census Bureau population estimates released today. As of July 1, 2006, this desert metropolis had a population of 1.5 million.
New York continued to be the nation’s most populous city, with 8.2 million residents. This was more than twice the population of Los Angeles, which ranked second at 3.8 million. (See Table 1 Excel | PDF.)
The estimates reveal that Phoenix moved into fifth place ahead of Philadelphia, the latest evidence of a decades-long population shift. Nearly a century ago, in 1910, each of the 10 most populous cities was within roughly 500 miles of the Canadian border. The 2006 estimates show that seven of the top 10 — and three of the top five — are in states that border Mexico.
Only three of the top 10 from 1910 remained on the list in 2006: New York, Chicago and Philadelphia. Conversely, three of the current top 10 cities (Phoenix; San Jose, Calif.; and San Diego) were not even among the 100 most populous in 1910, while three more (Dallas, Houston and San Antonio) had populations of less than 100,000. (See fact sheet. [PDF])
The estimates also reveal that many of the nation’s fastest-growing cities are suburbs. North Las Vegas, Nev., a suburb of Las Vegas, had the nation’s fastest growth rate among large cities (100,000 or more population) between July 1, 2005, and July 1, 2006. North Las Vegas’ population increased 11.9 percent during the period, to 197,567. It was joined on the list of the 10 fastest-growing cities by three in the Dallas metro area: McKinney (ranking second), Grand Prairie (sixth) and Denton (ninth). In the same vicinity, Fort Worth just missed the list, ranking 11th.
Florida and Arizona each had two cities among the 10 fastest growing: Port St. Lucie (third) and Cape Coral (fourth) in Florida; and Gilbert (fifth) and Peoria (seventh) in Arizona, both near Phoenix. North Carolina (Cary, near Raleigh) and California (Lancaster, near Los Angeles) each contributed one city to the list. (See Table 2 Excel | PDF.) California had seven cities among the 25 fastest growing, leading all states.
Phoenix had the largest population increase of any city between 2005 and 2006, adding more than 43,000 residents to reach 1.5 million. However, Texas dominated the list of the 10 highest numerical gainers, with San Antonio, Fort Worth, Houston, Austin and Dallas each making the top 10. North Las Vegas; Miami; Charlotte, N.C.; and San Jose, Calif., rounded out the list of the 10 biggest numerical gainers. (See Table 3 Excel | PDF.) Overall, eight Texas cities were among the 25 biggest numerical gainers to lead all states.
New Orleans had by far the largest population
loss among all cities with populations of at least 100,000 people. The city
lost slightly more than half of its pre-Hurricane Katrina population. It fell
from 452,170 on July 1, 2005, to 223,388 one year later — a loss of
50.6 percent. To put the size of this loss into perspective, Hialeah, Fla.,
which experienced the second-highest rate of loss over the period, saw its
population decline by 1.6 percent.
(See Table 4 Excel | PDF.)
For more information about the geographic areas for which the Census Bureau produces population estimates, see <http://www.census.gov/popest/geographic>.
These estimates are based on Census 2000 population counts — updated using information on building permits and other estimates of change.
SOURCE: US Census Bureau
John Elwell - REALTOR
Bill Nye Realty, Inc.
Licensed in Florida